- “the
University failed to produce any public records called for by (CalAware’s)
request until after the initiation and service of the instant lawsuit, which
records established that the University did possess public records responsive
to the request as of . . . April 6 . . .
- “the
University’s failures to follow the California Public Records Act, and to
produce records when and as requested, whether deliberate, negligent or
inadvertent, constitute violations of its obligations under the California
Public Records Act, which contains no requirement that bad faith or a similar mens
rea be proven in
order to establish an actionable violation. . .
- “the
reasonable inference from the evidence produced is that the University, in its
official capacity, has ‘used’ the contract between the Washington Speaker’s
Bureau (with Ms. Palin and the CSU Foundation) in the conduct of the public’s
business; therefore, said contract is also a public record and should have been
produced to Petitioner.”
Judge
Beauchesne was referring to evidence contained in an e-mail eventually made
public by the University showing that CSU Chancellor Charles Reed was aware of
the fee contracted to be paid to Palin for her speaking appearance at the July
20 celebration of the campus’s 50th Anniversary Gala.
The judge
also granted CalAware a writ of mandate requiring the University to release the
contract as well as any so far unreleased “documentation related to the use of
University property, personnel, facilities or services provided in connection
with the Gala for which the University sought or will seek reimbursement from
the Foundation.” He found,
however, that the Foundation itself was not subject to the Public Records Act.
Finally,
Judge Beauchesne ordered the University to pay CalAware the costs and attorney’s
fees it incurred in bringing the lawsuit.
Attorneys
Kelly Aviles, CalAware President Dennis Winston, and CalAware General Counsel Terry Francke, all of whom represented CalAware in
the lawsuit, issued the following joint statement:
"We
are very pleased with the decision. Judge Beauchesne, who had taken the
matter under submission on August 2nd, carefully considered the
arguments of all the parties. Ultimately, he correctly sided with the
public's right to be informed about how its money is being spent. This
ruling upholds California citizens' right to maintain oversight and control of
their government. Public oversight is the only way that citizens are
assured that public money is handled in an appropriate matter. We are
hopeful that this will prompt CSU to reevaluate the way in which it handles public
records requests in the future."
From a CSU Stanislaus faculty member - THANK YOU!!!!
Posted by: steven filling | Wednesday, August 25, 2010 at 09:16 PM
KO KO KO....KEAI DE CHUN GUNIANG MAI ZHE QINGYING DE JIAOBU LAI DAO RENJIAN.
Posted by: Nike Shox R4 | Wednesday, April 06, 2011 at 11:29 PM
Always good to come across a really thoughtful site,LIKE YOUR BLOG. LOVE LOVE LOVE IT!
Posted by: beijing opera night show | Wednesday, December 28, 2011 at 06:01 AM